Getting to know AutoCAD Architecture, MEP & Mechanical

AutoCAD Architecture-MEP-Mechanical 2014

Do you make regular use of AutoCAD Architecture (ACA), AutoCAD MEP (AME) or AutoCAD Mechanical (ACM)? If so, I'd be interested in hearing from you.

First, some background. Something I haven't yet talked about on this blog is an additional role I've picked in recent months: I'm now the (software) architect assigned to the three, above-mentioned, AutoCAD-based verticals. These products have a long history – and make quite varied use of AutoCAD's APIs – so I was excited by the opportunity.

Incidentally, this doesn't mean the focus of this blog is changing, at all – my role for these products relates to how we use core AutoCAD APIs to implement user-oriented functionality and is less about their own APIs – but I do expect the new role to lead to the occasional blog post (such as this one, in fact).

I used to know ACA fairly well, back in the day: by the turn of the millennium I'd been working with and supporting the APIs for Architectural Desktop for a couple of years, although I stopped soon after when I moved to the US to manage the DevTech Americas team. I'm sure lots has happened with the product since, and I look forward to getting familiar with it, once again.

I know AME less well, although being so closely connected with ACA should make things easier. ACM, on the other hand, is brand new to me: I've been aware of its existence since before Autodesk acquired the technology, but this is the first time it has come into my personal area of focus. That said, my first prolonged exposure to AutoCAD was at an engineering firm close to where I grew up, and the work they did was typical of the tasks many of our users perform with ACM.

To help get a better understanding of how these products are used, I thought I'd reach out via this blog to see whether anyone reading would volunteer some time to show me how they use one or more of these three products. This would ideally be an in-person visit – although for logistical reasons it'll be easier for that to happen with companies based close to my location (i.e. Switzerland and parts of France, Germany, Italy and Austria) – but it may also be possible to find other opportunities to meet and even to use online tools to meet virtually.

Unfortunately it's highly unlikely I'll be able to use the opportunity to help solve specific issues you're facing – my current knowledge of these products means I'm unlikely to be able to provide you with support of any calibre – but I would see it it as one way to make your priorities for the product you care about heard by at least one member of the team who develops it.

So, if you're interested in talking about – and potentially demonstrating – how you or your company makes use of either AutoCAD Architecture, AutoCAD MEP or AutoCAD Mechanical, please drop me a line.

3 responses to “Getting to know AutoCAD Architecture, MEP & Mechanical”

  1. James Maeding Avatar

    I'd like to see you involved in the Civil side of things also. Not that that area is deficient somewhow, but that many issues are similar. For instance, data sharing. You will be making models and sharing the parts. Does that happen via extenal database, external xml's, something like vault...and so on. The issue of splitting up data and displaying things assembled is key to getting users to trust and use the tools. C3D needs a revamp in that area, and I would love to see the teams at Autodesk work together for one solution or at least a common set of options for data storing/sharing.

  2. Kean Walmsley Avatar

    Hi James,

    Unfortunately that's not my area. There's lots being done around sharing via online tools (such as AutoCAD WS, now called AutoCAD 360), so hopefully something will come up there that meets your needs.

    Regards,

    Kean

  3. James Maeding Avatar

    You may think its not, but the building industries are all tied together. Just depends if you deal with writing feature specs, or simply implement something already decided on. Either way, the cloud based efforts Autodesk is doing are simply an incremental change on sharing already written stuff. The data sharing I am talking about is architectural. Things like the ability to access c3d objects a whole drawing at a time, instead of one by one. The idea that I must have a read-only heavy aec object in my drawing to access its data is nuts for real civil industry. LDT had that, C3D is actually miles behind due to the lack of it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *