Instant 3D model capture

While in our San Francisco office, the week before last, I bumped into Brian Mathews and team as they were making their final preparations for the TED 2011 conference. I don't know how many of you know about TED: it's an amazing conference - and information resource - that I'm proud to say that Autodesk sponsors. It's a dream of mine to attend this event in person (maybe one day I'll get the chance) but at least the sessions are posted online for everyone to enjoy.

The Autodesk Labs team has put together some really fun technology – as described in some detail by Scott Sheppard on his blog – that makes it even easier to capture 3D models using photography.

I've talked at great length about Microsoft Photosynth and Autodesk Photo Scene Editor, in the past, both of which take sets of images and create 3D models of some kind (whether point clouds or – in the case of the next version of Photo Scene Editor – textured meshes), and both work very well with static scenes. The problems start when you want to capture something more dynamic/transient in nature, as it's hard to move the camera quickly enough – even when shooting video and extracting stills – to get accurate feature recognition across images.

The Labs team have put together something really neat: an array of cameras attached to a rig and connected to a device that coordinates their actions – essentially taking a picture from each at exactly the same time. It's a bit like a version of bullet time that handles the specific case of the photos being taken simultaneously.

The resultant images get sent to the Photofly servers to generate a texture 3D mesh, useable in (and exportable from) an as-yet-unreleased version of Photo Scene Editor, codenamed "Caipi".

I haven't yet heard whether the TED luminaries found the technology of interest, although I'm sure they will have – this stuff is really cool.

  1. Hi Kean,
    Sometimes I wish Autodesk would put money into solving long lived actual problems like the reg apps problem that still plagues AutoCad dwgs. If they have money for sponsoring things like the TED event, they surely can invest in sweeping problems with existing products. I did look at the list of speakers at that event, I too would like to listen to some of them. Tha papercutter artist one in particular. There is an instant watch video from netflix called "between the folds" I think. Funny name, but absolutely amazing what the master paper folders can do. I also like the Rivers and Tides video. Right along the TED conference line of thought...

  2. Hi James,

    Well, I guess we see things differently.

    In my view Autodesk has worked really hard to provide the ability to remove excess RegAppIds (which were mostly created by incorrectly coded external applications rather than AutoCAD itself), whether via AutoCAD PURGE or external tools. I've also invested significant effort myself to help you through this problem via a recent series of blog posts.

    If there's still a significant customer issue then I'm confident AutoCAD Product Management will hear about it and take appropriate action.

    The fact that we invest money in something that is a great resource to the community - and that I'm personally proud we're associated with - is really a separate question.

    Regards,

    Kean

  3. James Maeding Avatar

    Hi Kean,
    I sould have been more specific.
    Your efforts on the reg app issue have been great, and are separate from the effort I was referring to - that of fixing the problem permanently so your team did not have to keep dealing with it. I did not mean to puish your good deeds, I apologize as I probably managed to do so. I am curious, though, what kind of effort you think it would take to change the behaviour where regapps stay in a drawing even when the infecting xref is detached.
    Both the sponsorship and fixing behind the scenes issues are needed, its two good things at once.
    I did get a kick out of the TED conference Patron category cost, $125,000. Even the cheap seats in Palm springs for $3500 got my attention. The youtube videos are really neat though, so even if the event is a bit restricted, we get to benefit from it later.

  4. Hi Kean,

    I'd be really interested to see the Photofly output from that "Bullet-camera" - as I'm sure you are.

    It strikes me as the kind of application that a series of Kinects should be able to accomplish - not that I have any of them to have a go. 🙁

    Cheers,

    Alex.

  5. Kean Walmsley Avatar

    I'm *still* waiting for mine! 🙁

    Kean

  6. Kean Walmsley Avatar

    That's cool! I would have guessed at them using an RGB-D camera for the 3D capture (the resulting headshots are very Kinect-like), but apparently not.

    I'll have to look at the "making of" video, when I get some time.

    Kean

  7. Looks like the idea is gaining momentum:

    See Channel 9:

    channel9.msdn.com/posts/TechFest-2011-3D-Scanning-with-a-regular-camera-or-phone

    Jeff

  8. It certainly looks that way. It's very interesting to see what Microsoft is doing in this space.

    Kean

Leave a Reply to Jeff Geer Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *